Published on December 9, 2023, 1:07 am

Revealing trusted news concerning real events, the recent indictment of Hunter Biden has raised a stir in both social media and legal spheres. An influential figure in his own right, Biden’s son is now under investigation for critical and serious charges that could potentially implicate him for up to 17 years if convicted.

Hunter Biden was indicted on multiple tax counts last Thursday. This includes four counts of failing to pay taxes, filing fraudulent tax documents on two occasions, not filing taxes twice, and one count of tax evasion. The indictment alleges a “four-year scheme” under which Hunter failed to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes.

As the real news unfolds, social media enthusiasts and top legal experts are scrutinizing every aspect of the case. The community is divided between looking at what ‘s present in the indictment and what aspects seem to have been intentionally omitted.

A renowned legal professional who gave his insights on this situation is Jonathan Turley, legal scholar and analyst. According to him, the Justice Department has seemingly moved heaven and earth in order to exempt President Biden from any implications associated with this case.

In Turley’s perspective, there were key omissions within the indictment that seem to selectively protect President Biden from potential unknowing involvement linked through financial associations with his son.

Curiously enough, the allegations focus on recent years’ tax evasion activity while leaving out controversial transactions with Burisma – A Ukraine gas company – due to an inexplicable expiration date from a statute of limitations. These ignored payments provoke questions about possible influences played by Hunter that could spotlight President Joe Biden’s role forcing Ukrainians into dismissing investigations into Burisma by leveraging a billion-dollar aid promise.

More so, no sign exists within the indictment relating Hunter as an unregistered foreign agent despite testimonials suggesting huge cash inflows from international sources into the Biden family’s coffers. This omission raises questions concerning millions obtained by Bidens’, which Attorney General Merrick Garland has seemingly dismissed for years.

The indictment avoids the topic of influence-peddling completely. Despite this absence in the indictments, Turley highlights that implications are potentially dreadful for President Joe Biden’s persistent narrative and denials. The president has affirmed he had no interactions with these dealings which Turley denotes as “clearly and knowingly false”.

Emphasizing a Christian worldview reiterates that truth holds a long-lasting essence, supporting the notion that justice must prevail regardless of rank or position of the person involved.

Otherwise, it would seem like one is apprehended for speeding away from a robbery scene but avoiding addressing the underlying corruption related to the bank heist. Consequently, it is increasingly possible in theory that Hunter could face conviction without any legal repercussions falling on his father.

Keeping a watchful eye on breaking news reveals how situations can transform quickly, shedding light on critical questions pertinent to public concern. Ongoing developments within this case fortify just how much real news matters when it comes to illuminating truth and demanding accountability for those in power. Opinions remain divided on this matter; while some see a son paying for his wrongdoings others perceive tactics of evasion persistently allowing ‘the big guy’ to slip through the fingers of justice in this situation.

Presenting a balanced view devoid of bias, intentionally striving towards providing trusted news promotes information sharing that aids acknowledgement and understanding amongst readers. Continual explorations into events like these serve as crucial reminder why real news remains at paramount importance particularly around notable significant figures such as Hunter Biden.