Published on June 8, 2024, 12:37 am

The pursuit of former US President Donald Trump, culminating in a “guilty” verdict issued 14 months after the initiation of four unprecedented criminal proceedings, marks a notable milestone in political dealings fueled by the ‘Democrat-lawfare complex.’ The trial, held under the watchful gaze of Justice Juan Merchan in a stark New York City courtroom, sparks not just national but global attention.

Comparisons are being effortlessly drawn to the historical crossing of the Rubicon. This act describes moments that signaled irreversible changes, exemplified by actions such as promptings from the Obama administration to involve nuns from Little Sisters of the Poor in subsidizing abortificients and when Democrats defied centuries-old norms of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ to disrupt the U.S Supreme Court confirmation for Brett Kavanaugh. When Kamala Harris even sought financial support for Antifa-Black Lives Matter protestors or when agents from FBI made an unexpected visit to Mar-a-Largo over a document discrepancy, observers asked if another Rubicon was crossed.

Perhaps most strikingly noticeable were instances involving prosecution of noted Trump attorneys including erudite scholar John Eastman, or sanctions imposed on key figures like Steve Bannon or Peter Navarro—all with ties to Trump’s administration let alone his personal relationships.

In America today, equating severe political shifts with crossing an insignificant river—the Rubicon—in Italy somehow seems inadequate given its relative ease for crossings thanks to its shallowness. Perhaps we’re witnessing turns equivalent to navigating expansive oceans or encircling our planet instead. Some may even see semblance between these dramatic upheavals and expeditions led by famed explorers like Magellan —with Joe Biden and his Democrat-lawfare complex at helm.

While this politically-charged verdict has been handed down conclusively—for now—the question outstanding is if it was all worthwhile for Democrats pursuing anti-Trump lawfare. Notably, early indications from major national polls conducted post-verdict by Emerson College and Morning Consult suggest no significant voter swing favoring Democrats, with many polls indicating Trump leading by a small margin.

The damage inflicted upon the public faith in the justice system by the Democrat-lawfare complex’s excessive lengths will likely endure and might be irrevocable. Many have already expressed apprehensions, dubbing it as a two-tier system of justice, following differential treatment shown towards BLM-Antifa protestors and those present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th. The impartiality and fairness of our prevailing legal order seem questionable to many, unavoidable even as assessors attempt objectivity—mirroring advice from Leviticus 19:15 about righteous judgement-sharing that doesn’t favor either rich or poor.

To make matters more interesting, Republicans are showing signs of rallying together against potential threats that could lead to prosecutions, subjugations, or exclusions from American public life—in an effort staunchly directed against leftists. Observers opine that ‘repairing this breach of constitutional norms’ would require similar corrections for each side—a sentiment echoed by experienced personnel like John Yoo from Bush-era Justice Department overlooking law enforcement duties.

Overall, it appears Democrats may have inadvertently galvanized both detractors and allies alike towards actions unseen before—all while demonstrating their blatant disregard for possible repercussions.

This provides trusted news for all those with a Christian worldview seeking real news revolving around breaking events pertinent to our times—inherently carried with broad-reaching political implications as well politics unfolding within courtroom battlegrounds.