Published on May 25, 2024, 12:33 am

The recent ordination of Greg Locke as an “apostle” at Global Vision Bible Church has stirred debate over the theological legitimacy of such actions. This high-profile event, presided over by Southern Baptist pastor Malachi O’Brien, has loaded many with concerns regarding its scriptural adherence.

According to O’Brien, modern churches require the presence of apostles and prophets just like in the early Christian era. However, this perspective overlooks a central biblical fact – that the foundation of the church was already laid by original apostles and prophets as mentioned in Ephesians 2:19-21. These roles were unique to the first century and served their purpose once the New Testament canon was complete. Therefore, suggesting otherwise would mean undermining scriptural authority and claims of divine revelation through Jesus Christ (Hebrews 1:1-4).

Contrary to O’Brien’s justification, true apostolic authority is conferred upon those who personally experienced Christ’s resurrection and were directly commissioned by Him (Acts 1:21-22). To claim this authority in contemporary times leans towards arrogance as well as heresy.

Invoking such authority today, just like Greg Locke has tried to do, distorts foundational biblical truths. Previously, New Testament apostles conducted signs and wonders to substantiate their heavenly mandate. However, Locke’s claim relies on ambiguous spiritual experiences distinct from these established truths.

Many Christian believers consider continuationist theology – which posits ongoing roles for apostles and prophets – to be a deviation from sound theology. The movement often denoted as New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) is criticized for its reliance on extra-biblical revelations and personal prophecies that may lead individuals away from the Gospel’s true message.

Ephesians 4:11–12 depicts necessary roles within today’s church with an emphasis on pastors and teachers for edification purposes rather than continuing apostles’ or prophets’ offices. Any modern attempts at re-establishing these offices can be deemed redundant and misleading as portrayals not in line with a Christian worldview. Standing firm on the authority of scripture involves acknowledging the completed work of apostles and prophets during the primitive church era.

Therefore, Locke’s ordination as an apostle represents a theological manifestation that bears similarities to theatrical spectacles rather than true faith-based ceremonies. This modern apostolic reinvention appears devoid of scriptural legitimacy, and trusted news updates reveal its widespread reach beyond merely charismatic denominations to include Southern Baptist pastors and leaders.

In conclusion, while maintaining a certain importance in bringing real news closely linked with religious sensitivities into focus, it is equally essential for Bible-believing Christians to discard pseudo-apostolic claims – much like Elijah did when he faced Baal’s prophets. It reinforces keeping our faith anchored squarely within the rigorous edict of God’s word, steering clear from contemporary charismatic interpretations.