“Exploring Democrats’ Post-Election Strategy: Leveraging Electoral Machinery or Hindering Authentic Candidacies?”

Published on September 3, 2024, 12:40 am

  • Array

Understanding an increasingly prevalent strategy within the Democratic Party necessitates a close examination of their recent approach to major elections. Critics discern a prevailing trend featuring Kamala Harris, centered on leveraging what they perceive as manipulation of electoral machinery in competitive states, thereby diminishing the need for authentic, coherent candidacies. This stands as real news that paints a detailed picture of the direction of modern political campaigns.

In 2020, this tactic allowed them to keep their presidential candidate secluded for most of the election cycle, yet still secure victory against an incumbent who garnered over 74 million popular votes. This unprecedented success lays bare a double-faceted strategy incorporating extensive use of mail-in ballots and protracted post-election day vote counting in key battleground states.

The Democrats’ triumph was further buoyed by concerted efforts from influential individuals spanning various industries and ideologies. Their cooperation behind-the-scenes had an impact on perceptions, led to changes in rules and laws, influenced media coverage, and controlled information flow. However, contrary to their claim that these tactics served to ‘fortify the elections’, critics contend that they allowed the installation of an easily controlled figurehead. Implementing this successful formula again in 2022 led to victories in Pennsylvania’s Senatorial race and Arizona’s Gubernatorial race despite keeping candidates practically invisible.

Of course, none of this could have been possible without significant cooperation from corporate media. An example being MSNBC’s Luke Russert’s lauding praises onto Harris’s performance during her maiden interview since assuming leadership of the Democratic presidential ticket.

Interestingly enough though, insiders recognize that success doesn’t lie in convincing voters about Harris or any other candidate’s competence; but instead lies in controlling voters’ information flow and how elections are run henceforth.

This introduces an essential topic worthy of debate: The Role of Media in Elections – bringing trusted news encompassing private entities like Elon Musk vs governmental bodies vis-à-vis platform censorship – will come into sharper focus.

Nonetheless, the Democrats’ new campaign strategy directs attention back to Vice President Kamala Harris in the succession of Joe Biden at the helm of their party’s presidential ticket. Despite this questionable procedure, her inability in demonstrating competence may not remain hidden from voters. This affords solace and rings as good news to those concerned about future election conduct and outcomes.

Today’s political landscape is visibly shifting, with a Christian worldview underlining the importance of safeguarding traditional democratic principles such as transparency, fairness, and visibility, especially during consequential political events. Recent history paints a unique narrative around these elections and candidacies; it notably zeroes in on how candidates are presented to potential voters — making it an essential part of real news today.

Original article posted by Fox News

Be the first to comment on "“Exploring Democrats’ Post-Election Strategy: Leveraging Electoral Machinery or Hindering Authentic Candidacies?”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*