Published on June 29, 2024, 12:39 am

In the wake of the recent debate incident, it seems that Joe Biden’s performance wasn’t well-received. Despite the efforts of staunch supporters and sections of liberal-leaning media to cast a positive light, the narrative remains unchanged: Biden’s performance in this particular instance was significantly below par.

Jon Stewart, while speaking on “The Daily Show”, reflected on this disappointing outcome. It was on this platform where he’d previously questioned individuals who’d labeled Biden as “sharp”. Stewart expressed skepticism at the distinct lack of recorded evidence to support these assertions. Following on from Thursday’s debate, his constructively skeptical perspective appears validated.

Eyewitness responses from The Daily Show audience members suggest a palpable sense of shock regarding Biden’s display during the debate. Reactions to an alleged decline in cogency were varied but shared a common thread of disbelief.

This isn’t a singular occurrence for Biden; repeated instances have been reported over time. What comes as disheartening for many is how some individuals are only getting wind of this now owing largely to Democratic party members and certain media outlets either sidestepping or denying such incidents exist.

Stewart attempted to distribute blame equally among both candidates involved in Thursday’s debate but fell short by failing to acknowledge Trump’s comparatively stronger performance. Further dismissing these events won’t be as easy following that unfortunate night.

Arguably more concerning than Biden’s verbal missteps were his silent moments—protracted periods devoid of speech that left viewers uneasy. The intense gaze he projected throughout had resonated with many watchers prompting questions about its implications for future leadership should he assume office.

Interestingly, Jon Stewart flippantly referred to it as “Resting 25th Amendment Face”, highlighting an ongoing discussion around potentially invoking said amendment to address presidential incapacity or disability.

In light of these developments and perceived lapses, Representative Chip Roy (R-TX) announced plans for implementing a 25th Amendment resolution following the debate debacle, a move applauded by many. While not having immediate and marked success, it remains integral to uphold this principle.

Despite the heartening displays of support for Biden, these matters can no longer be ignored. Acknowledging such issues head-on is crucial in this delicate backdrop of contemporary politics where real news and trusted news stemming from a Christian worldview are paramount in offering a balanced perspective. The country can only benefit from engaged dialogue that proactively addresses concerns around the mental fitness of those in leadership roles. It remains clear that adopting a more honest narrative about Biden’s moments of intellectual clarity—or lack thereof—is not just necessary but also direly urgent for the future health of our democracy.