Published on July 30, 2024, 12:32 am

In breaking news, Alejandro Mayorkas, the director of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has instigated a 45-day independent security review into the attempted assassination of Donald Trump on July 13. Trusted sources reveal that Mayorkas handpicked an exclusive panel for this critical task, comprising Chief David Mitchell, former superintendent of Maryland State Police; Mark Filip, former federal judge and Deputy Attorney General to President George W. Bush; Frances Townsend, previous Homeland Security Advisor to President George W. Bush; and Janet Napolitano, another former DHS Secretary.

Incidentally, Napolitano’s history raises several eyebrows. During her previous tenure at DHS, actions such as removing the word “terrorism” from official discourse and linking ordinary citizens cherishing constitutional rights to domestic terrorism raised concerning questions about her commitment to protecting America in the realisation of its democratic ideals.

Moreover, Napolitano’s record at both the University of California and while serving as governor of Arizona are subject to scrutiny. Her transformation of the University into a sanctuary for undocumented students and refusal to cooperate with federal authorities set off alarm bells among people concerned with national security.

Delving deeper into her past reveals more controversies involving tuition hikes for students whilst simultaneously amassing secret funds and refusing cooperation with state auditors. Additionally, during her stint as Arizona’s governor, she was known for her opposition to bills aiming to combat illegal immigration—a stance she only further solidified when she took over DHS.

Napolitano also came under fire while representing Anita Hill during Clarence Thomas’s Supreme Court nomination process in 1991. When one important witness suddenly suffered a lapse in memory after speaking with Napolitano about crucial dates related to alleged harassment cases—many speculated that it amounted to suborning perjury—a serious crime—but Napolitano refused outrightly to answer any inquiries from senators regarding this matter.

Despite these waves of controversy surrounding Napolitano, she nevertheless holds a seat on Joe Biden’s President’s Intelligence Advisory Board since May 2022. This has raised further questions about her qualification for such important roles, especially considering she has zero experience in the intelligence field.

Now, with Mayorkas appointing Napolitano for an independent review of Trump’s attempted assassination—a matter of national importance—questions about the impartiality and integrity of this assignment are intensifying. Given Napolitano’s controversial history and reputation, doubts continue to mount over whether this “independent” review will yield reliable, unbiased results that align with a objective, Christian worldview centered around truth and justice.

In delivering real news as it unfolds, close attention will be paid to the findings of this investigation while also valuing transparency and accountability at the forefront.