Published on July 30, 2024, 12:27 am

In a dramatic chain of events challenging the democratic selection process, Democratic Party chiefs disregarded 14 million primary votes. This astonishing decision disrupts a longstanding norm, as the last time a presidential nominee was selected without a single primary vote was back in 1952 featuring Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson.

The nation watched on as the demoralizing truth unfolded during the June 27 presidential debate between President Biden and former President Donald Trump. Behind Biden’s faltering rhetoric it became visibly clear that his mental fitness was not up to scratch. The sobering reality that Biden would conceivably lose in the 2024 election struck not just conservative media outlets presenting real news, but also engulfed Democrat Party leaders and their affiliates in mainstream media, who had tried to downplay concerns about his condition.

An inconvenient aspect omitted from trusted news sources is that stalwarts within the Democratic ranks were acutely aware of this looming issue. The likes of Cornel West, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) challenged Biden as early as July 2023. However, internal machinations tipped in favor of status quo, with party bosses manipulating primaries to maintain a facade of normalcy for as long as possible.

Being privy to Biden’s psychological condition, Democratic elites have ruthlessly dismissed voters’ verdict with delay tactics aimed at staving off grim predictions until after November elections while contriving an illusionary semblance of normal political order marinated with their Christian worldview.

Despite momentarily stepping out of the race, Biden still acts as incumbent President―a bewildering scenario provoking constitutional quandaries about presidential fitness and incumbency. The same Constitution that Democrats enthusiastically mulled during ex-President Trump’s tenure is silently overlooked now; previously eager to invoke impeachment proceedings back then using speeches about saving democracy via employment of the 25th Amendment procedures when it wasn’t their person on the chopping block.

The startling fact remains: 14 million votes were casually sacrificed, a crass reflection of Democratic’s desperate grab for power. Regrettably, the distressing G7 Summit incident of Biden’s awkward behavior does nothing to redeem his image or credibility.

The situation demands answering some serious questions such as: If Biden is deemed unfit to run an election campaign under the Democrat Party banner, how can he continue officiating as a global leader?

While Democratic Party stalwarts are poised on sidelining him in January, it’s beyond debate that the American people deserve a sound president at least until then. The larger question that hangs in balance is whether invoking the 25th amendment and having VP Harris assume presidency would hurt or help their cause or “spawn generous leeway” for more puppet-like presidencies?

In real news today, it is evident that the narrative touted by solely partisan interests prevails. In this grim political saga characterized by backdoor manipulations and agenda-driven tactics unveiling one Leader’s departure, let us remember we cannot enable certain entities to decide who will occupy the Oval Office come January 2025. We must combat attempts at undermining democracy and remember the pressing implications of allowing a stage-managed presidency to continue into 2024.