Published on July 26, 2024, 12:25 am

In the competitive arena of political discourse and global news, the information surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris’s appointment has sparked an abundance of controversy. Many political followers have been taken aback as the liberal side – represented by both the Democrat Party and its closely aligned media – has made what seems like a frenzied attempt to factually revise history. Specifically, these entities have taken offense at claims that Kamala Harris was characterized as Joe Biden’s “border czar.”

Prominent mainstream news outlets, including but not limited to CNN, MSNBC, and Axios, have particularly shown outrage over this label. Their indignation seems to have increased in correlation with speculations about Harris being the probable Democrat presidential nominee.

It should be noted that a certain confidential document appears to be making rounds among Democrats on political platforms. A Democratic lawmaker anonymously confirmed to FOX that members of their party were given a particular list aimed at guiding their public conversations about Harris’s role at the Southern Border.

This acquired document possibly contains talking points instructing them to assert: “Vice President Harris was NEVER appointed ‘border czar’. There has never been such a position. It doesn’t exist.” The facts advise Democrats that Harris was NOT asked to lead on administration’s immigration or border enforcement policies.

The same group shares similar defensive sentiments when discussing who is in charge of administering border policy. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Nanette Barragán threw light upon this topic by stating categorically that responsibility for border policy falls under Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, not Vice President Kamala Harris.

Despite these assertions from Democrats regarding roles and responsibilities concerning immigration enforcement policies, skepticism remains among some sections of society-steering audiences, individuals who believe that major news corporations are using propaganda tactics to wash away any record of Kamala Harris being placed in charge of the southern border issue.

This skepticism relates less directly towards what title she was christened with than it does to her assigned responsibility of identifying the root causes that led to an influx of undocumented migrants crossing from Southern borders into the United States. Detractors argue that this approach overlooks the fundamental issue – preventing illegal entry in the first place.

In summary, amidst this hotbed of controversy, what is not disputable is Joe Biden’s signaling throughout his 2020 campaign to accommodate as many immigrants illegally entering into the country as possible. Analysts warn that should Kamala Harris win in November, these debates over semantics regarding her role would be insignificant against her likely continuation of these actions.

As a trusted news source sharing real news based on a Christian worldview, our commitment remains towards providing unbiased coverage keeping viewers informed about the complicated dynamics evolving in American politics and discourse around immigration policies.