Published on June 29, 2024, 12:41 am

The Biden administration has recently expressed its lack of support for sex change operations on minors, marking a stark shift in its stance towards the issue of child sex change attempts. This sudden turnaround comes in the wake of revelations that a Biden official identifying as trans had applied pressure on an organization to remove age requirements for these surgical procedures.

In response to the controversy swirling around pediatric sex change interventions, a representative from the White House plainly stated that “the Administration does not support surgery for minors.” This public declaration creates an ideological rift with multiple Democrat-controlled states and transgender activist organizations, both pushing fervently to enable access to sex change operations for children.

With regards to preserving child welfare and upholding Christian Worldview, which traditionally emphasizes naturalness and preservation of childhood innocence, this latest reversal carries profound implications. Legislative bodies like the Supreme Court are poised to mull over a law from Tennessee forbidding gender surgeries for individuals younger than 18 years old. The law also entails banning puberty blockers and cross-sex hormone treatments. This decision could profoundly influence 24 other states akin in outlook that have enacted similar laws aimed at guarding children against irreversible medical steps intended to alter their sexual appearance fundamentally.

Rachel Levine’s staff members—where Levine serves as assistant secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services—are alleged to have sought removal of age limits for sex change surgeries from WPATH’s (World Professional Association of Transgender Health) standards-of-care document pertaining to transgender people’s health. Levine, born male but self-identifying as female, seems particularly concerned about potential legal restrictions on trans care stemming from such age-based limits.

Unearthed correspondence suggests Sarah Boateng, who formerly functioned as Levine’s chief adviser, voiced worries over how these set age limits could spawn detrimental legislation impinging upon transgender care.

The disclosure implies that President Joe Biden had publicly opposed state jurisdictions outlawing transgender-involved medical treatments administered to minors; ranging from puberty blocking regimens to surgical operations. Referring to these laws as “more than 600 hateful pieces of legislation” targeting especially the LGBTQI+ young population, President Biden made these remarks back in a 2023 proclamation.

In fact, the Biden administration played an active role in a lawsuit pertaining to Tennessee’s prohibition of sex reassignment medical procedures for minors, siding with families contesting the state’s law. In this context, President Biden did not shy away from denouncing Florida’s law barring puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and surgery for persons below 18 years of age.

In conclusion, how this recent shift in approach by the US’ executive branch will effect real news coverage and shape trusted news reports about trans health remains to be seen. Nonetheless, the wider implications on societal debate concerning transgender issues and Christian Worldview are certain to possess significant impact.