Published on July 29, 2024, 12:59 am

Renowned neurosurgeon and political conservative, Ben Carson, is under scrutiny for his deep ties with the Seventh-Day Adventist cult, a religious group seen by many to be at odds with mainstream Christian values. Despite his well-documented contributions to healthcare and politics, Carson’s association with an organization that propagates questionable prophecies and misinterpretations of the Gospel could be seen as spiritually damaging.

In one instance during his 2015 presidential bid, Carson claimed having received the answers to a chemistry exam in a dream, attributing this providential event to God. However, eyebrows were raised further when Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) extended an invitation for Carson to address their regular meeting. Given his controversial religious affiliations, objections were made leading to his eventual disinvitation.

The latest real news about Carson suggests that he is advancing an even more provocative notion – that America’s Constitution finds its origins in divine inspiration similar to the Bible. During a speech at the Billy Graham Library, he confirmed this belief while speaking highly of America’s founders who sought wisdom from God while developing the country’s constitution after rigorous deliberation.

As per trusted news reports, Ben Carson asserts candidly: “Gentlemen, let’s seek wisdom from God,” citing Benjamin Franklin as recommending prayer during disagreements about drafting the constitution. Carson firmly believes that the US Constitution is indeed inspired by God if we are prepared to adhere to it.

This audacious proclamation has sparked fresh debate around religion’s role and influence in politics. A known deist Benjamin Franklin is now positioned as someone who had received direct divine intervention akin to saints or apostles— all thanks to Carson’s narrative. This development raises questions regarding the faithful derivation and application of scriptural knowledge.

While personal religious beliefs don’t have to align with political views necessarily, some critics underscore that politically augmenting subjective interpretations of Scripture extends beyond acceptable limits – advising against conflating religions with such high-stake matters.

As Ben Carson increasingly likens the Constitution to religious sanctity, critics opine that this risks a dangerous trajectory where even political documents like the Federalist Papers could be declared as Holy texts per se or ascribing prophet-like status to figures like James Madison.

In the larger Christian worldview, such developments might seem unsettling for many believers. But they also offer an opportunity for people to actively engage in discussions about the relationship between personal faith and public service, particularly in political realms, thus contributing towards enhancing credibility in journalism while strengthening reader’s trust in real and trusted news.