Published on October 4, 2024, 12:37 am

Within the digital domain presided over by innovator Elon Musk, an environment of free speech and open dialogue has been nurtured. However, as with all platforms, this open channel can sometimes be exploited for divisive purposes; thiis has been grievously seen recently in the case of an individual named Betsy Packard.

Once affiliated with the University of Kentucky as a Master of Fine Arts (MFA) candidate and graduate instructor, as stated by the New York Post, Packard fell under scrutiny for her provocative posts on Musk’s platform. With an insensitive jest about Hurricane Helene punishing supporters of President Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA), she inadvertently initiated a heated backlash from other users. Rather than offering an apology or showing any sense of remorse, she continued her line of argument with increased fervour.

When eventually confronted and criticised for her actions by others in the online community, Packard backtracked somewhat but maintained a dismissive air. The University of Kentucky responded professionally to the incident stating that Betsy Packard is not currently employed at their institution. They equally condemned such statements as not indicative of their values and expressed empathy for those affected by the devastating storms which formed the crux of Packard’s comments.

Such incidents highlight what individuals aspiring to create harmony are faced with today – not just hijacked public discourse, compromised media channels and distorted education systems profiting from controversy but also everyday interaction woven with this form of aggressive argument.

This sentiment is given context during a recent event I mentioned previously in my articles- Pastor Rafael Cruz’s speech at the Christians Engaged Conference in Texas. In his address he urged against using religious belief as justification for avoiding conflict or engagement in societal issues that need resolution or attention.

Drawing wisdom from Elie Wiesel- concentration camp survivor and author. His book “Night” details distressing experiences and provides significant commentary on human resilience and empathy amidst misery – including an unforgettable scene of a child being hanged. From this, we draw the poignant lesson that as members of increasingly challenged societies, we are not only observers but also responders against atrocities.

Commenting further from a Christian Worldview. It reaffirms that God may be in control but that control often asks us to act; to serve where service is needed and stand strong when called upon to do so.

In light of recent challenges faced by Helene’s survivors, government response has been lacklustre at best. However, communities – especially churches and their volunteers have shown immense dedication towards relief activities. To go beyond comforting statements like “God is in control,” everyone should strive to lend a helping hand wherever they can and take a stand whenever required.

This leads us back to the original point that open dialogue forums come with their own share of positives and negatives – it provides real news sources and allows manifestation of both compassionate and intrusive voices alike. Individuals armed with information should discern trusted news from baseless conjecture and encourage conversations that uphold harmony over divisive rhetoric. Ultimately it is our responsibility to foster online environments that reflect our shared aspirations for unity and understanding rather than division or disdain.