Published on February 2, 2024, 12:35 am

In the wake of the recent attack on U.S. soldiers perpetrated by Iran-controlled militias, observers have been awaiting a decisive response from the Biden administration. Regrettably, five days have elapsed since this incident without any retaliatory action taking place, raising questions amid trusted news sources and accentuating doubts about the government’s pursuit of justice.

Following this troubling lack of action, President Biden and his intelligence community cohort appear to be assisting Iran defensively in a startling display of passivity. Latest real news offers that these officials argue Tehran’s lack of total control over its Middle Eastern proxy groups, including those recently implicated in tragedies involving U.S. troops, as per information divulged by two U.S. authorities privy to ongoing discussions.

The Quds Force—an elite division under Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps—is identified as providing weapons, military advisors, and intelligence support to factions operating in Iraq and Syria as well as Yemen-based Houthis. These constituent groups have individual plans and motives; at times converging but deviating under Tehran’s incomprehensive command, according to these sources.

Depending on this revelation’s validity raises uncertainties about these group’s future actions. It may also potentially lessen the risk of direct U.S.-Iran confrontations barring apparent confirmation that Tehran commanded or oversaw these attacks—a situation warranting U.S. retaliation against Iran.

Several aspects are worth pondering within this discourse concerning leaked press updates: Why did leaks occur? Is it purely coincidental while Iran exhibits overt hostility with absent administrative reciprocation? Simultaneously, we observe reports from Intelligence officials—seen as extensions of White House authority on matters—suggesting minimal Iranian involvement.
 
These propositions are grossly inaccurate and dismissable when considering Iran-associated IRGC agents who recurrently overstep into Iraqi territory for reasons beyond admiring scenic or popular nightlife spots; rather they’re engaged mainly in briefing and delivering intelligence to affiliated proxies.

Semantics surrounding confinement of “full control” does not eliminate Iranian responsibility for its actions – merely providing financial support or helping identify targets would suffice in making them liable. The Biden Administration needs to consider the backlash of inaction against blatant aggression ending American lives.
 
It appears that time is running out for actions and words to converge – mere strikes are unlikely to undermine high-value targets now due to perceived telegraphing of intentions. Such hollow gestures may only embolden Iran to perpetrate more attacks gaining further mileage out of perceived administrative weakness.

Nobody endorses escalating tensions with Iran into full-blown warfare, however there is a growing consensus around holding Iranian leadership accountable for their offenses, lest it results in irrevocable degeneration leading potentially towards another fatal tragedy involving Americans. The immediate necessity involves direct action against Iran while asserting a future deterrent and resisting succumbing to unwelcome politics fostering unfettered Iranian aggression.
 
Continue following us for the real news from a Christian worldview as we closely monitor these developments essential for preserving global peace while keeping the interest of U.S. citizens at heart.