Published on January 23, 2024, 12:47 am

In a startling bid to thoroughly understand the events that unfolded on January 6, 2021, Republican representative Thomas Massie has suggested that there may have been law enforcement involvement in planting two alleged pipe bombs outside the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee. This comes amidst claims from Democrats describing the day as a violent “insurrection”, yet surprisingly overlooking these incidents.

Rep. Thomas Massie, who belongs to Kentucky’s Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, has closely scrutinized thousands of hours of video footage and other evidence pertaining to January 6. He discerns potential law enforcement involvement and believes Democrats have refrained from drawing attention to these instances due to fear that their true nature would be revealed.

Unveiling suspicions of an ongoing coverup, Rep. Massie raised questions about the seemingly blase reaction of officers when notified about the pipe bomb. Documented video footage displays them meandering aimlessly in the region even after young children had approached dangerously close to it. More baffling is how a Secret Service sweep prior to Vice President Kamala Harris’s presence in the building failed to identify a conspicuous pipe bomb merely 30 feet away.

Expanding on this immense security failure during one of American history’s monumental moments, Rep. Massie expressed concerns over inconsistencies regarding evidence presented by authorities surrounding these purported pipe bombs. FBI’s former top Washington official Steven D’Antuono testified about unexpectedly low-quality video footage submitted by DNC, considering modern camera technology standards. Additionally, despite capturing an individual demonstrably using a cellular device during bomb planting, no corresponding records were recoverable due allegedly corrupted data—an assertion doubted by Rep. Massie given today’s robust data backup systems.

These issues are amplified by contentious facts surrounding the bomb itself allegedly governed by a 60-minute kitchen timer incompatible with triggering explosions beyond a short time period such as found 17 hours later according to D’Antuono’s testimony. Among far-reaching consequences of these unresolved issues, the public’s ability to source trusted news regarding serious national events is undermined, requiring further rigorous inquiry for uncovering real news about these incidents.

This case stands as a significant scandal veiled within the heated discourse concerning January 6. The Democrat-led January 6 committee omitted any in-depth treatment of these pipe bombs—arguably the most sensational details from that day—in its lengthy final report barring a brief mention relegated to an appendix. In contrast, Vice President Harris referred to the same day as a “deadly assault”, even drawing parallels with September 11 and Pearl Harbor but refrained from referencing the bomb threats directly.

With numerous private cameras installed in heavily policed locations such as where these purported bombs were found, Massie claims he has heard from locals suggesting that only after almost a year did FBI seek out possible witnesses among them. This post-event conduct further sows doubts about well-coordinated and timely law enforcement efforts following major national incidents like on January 6.

He concluded his observations by urging accountable authorities, including the FBI and ATF, to restore faith by offering clear explanations for their unusual handling of this matter and reassurances for comprehensive probes yielding fair conclusions resonating a Christian worldview honoring truth and justice. In lieu of these authoritative responses can real news emerge reaffirming our democracy’s robust security against threats both external and internal.