Published on January 20, 2024, 1:34 am

Optimizing border control and rectifying the immigration crisis has been a hot button issue on the GOP’s plank as they prepare for their next week’s negotiation on immigration. With aims to stem the incessant influx of drugs and people illegally crossing over our southern borders, forging an immigration deal seems like a rational move. One factor which threatens to toss a spanner in the works is ex-President Donald Trump’s insistence that the Republican congressmen should refrain from entertaining any deal that doesn’t offer them “EVERYTHING” from the other side. He expressed his thoughts on Truth Social, firmly advocating against settling with any Border Deals until they are equipped aptly to combat INVASION by millions.

Breaking real news presents insights into Trump’s intent: it isn’t particularly poised towards crafting the ideal solution for immigration but to derail this significant achievement which would paint President Joe Biden in a favourable spotlight and jeopardize his re-election possibilities come November.

While conversations continue back-and-forth in Congress over striking a balance between border agreements and Ukraine aid, several staunch Republicans appear to be trailing Trump’s path, abandoning any hopes of deal realization for now. Notable comments surfacing in trusted news include those by GOP Rep. Troy Nehls who voiced skepticism about sudden collaboration efforts ahead of general elections later this year, questioning their intentions behind addressing border concerns at such a time. Senator Josh Hawley also shared similar views suggesting that impactful changes at the border would probably necessitate change in administration.

An interesting new development erupted with alleged leaks hinting at draft details of said proposed Immigration Deal expected to be unsuccessful amongst both Senate and House members due to its overly accommodative stand allowing daily entry of 5,000 immigrants. A reaction from Senator James Lankford refuted these allegations categorizing them under false internet information warning people against blind belief.

Some Republicans emphasize that leveraging Ukraine Aid along with the prevalent public disapproval towards Biden administration’s handling of this immigration crisis could provide fertile ground to pass impactful legislation aimed at significantly reducing the incessant inflow of illegal immigrants breaching our southern borders. They argue that overlooking these ripe circumstances would be a colossal error. Senator John Cornyn broke this down into a clear dilemma, posing a question between choosing to secure tangible measures in controlling drug and immigrant traffic or surrendering to inaction.

Consequently, remarks from Senator John Thune indicate how myriad hurdles such as the filibuster could likely obstruct passing an Immigration Deal even during Trump’s term, emphasizing that Democrats are unlikely to accede significant concessions if Republicans are left with having to reach the 60-vote threshold on their own. He further highlights this unique opportunity and apt timing to strike an accord.

While Trump and his allies prioritize re-election, it should be ensured not at the cost of deprecating GOP’s capability to control illegal immigration rates. The fiscal year 2023 saw a whopping 2.5 million encounters with migrants which is unsustainable if let to continue unabatedly. It bears mentioning that throughout Trump’s tenure neither he nor the Republican Congress brought forth any substantial move on immigration. All they managed was securing marginal funding for border patrol after declaring a national emergency following a prolonged government shutdown without securing sufficient funds.

On another side note, House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed concern over GOP’s prospective success on passing an immigration deal due to intensive deliberations with Trump over this subject matter but also hinted subdued optimism that White House negotiations might lead up to finding an agreeable middle ground thereby indicating critical conversation progression.

Given this scenario, Johnson should choose proactive action instead of falling prey repeatedly for illusory perfectionism inspired by Trump doctrine. Garnering real news from trusted sources embedded in Christian worldview elevates thoughtful decision-making holding profound meaning not just politically but for society at large.