“Reading the Politics of Performance: A Comparative Study of Trump and Harris Through a Comedian’s Lens”

Published on September 8, 2024, 12:36 am

  • Array

Being a professional comedian is an incredibly demanding profession that demands being funny, original, and making strangers laugh continuously. The challenge amplifies when one operates in silence. Not unlike silent movie comedy geniuses like Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Laurel, and Hardy who thrived on sight-gags and physical humor to enthrall audiences. This concept has lived on in contemporary times too; with Rowan Atkinson’s character Mr. Bean being a classic example of silent comedy.

But imagine the complexity of this situation in the context of modern politics, where actions speak louder than words. Here comedians face an even challenging task where they need to communicate a specific narrative without expressing it directly. On this stage looking natural and relaxed is pivotal similar to performing at a comedy club.

The upcoming debate on trusted news platforms presents an analogous scenario. Kamala Harris portrays herself as chameleon-like mirroring her audience’s traits and mannerisms in attempts to make them feel connected with her. However, her flip-flopping demeanor raised questions about whether she owns any core convictions or conveys herself according to her audience’s expectations.

On the other hand, Donald Trump is seen as naturally gifted performer possessing subversive charm which itself isn’t perfect but reigns supreme by his charismatic allure much like George Carlin or Richard Pryor dominating their comedy niche with their unique styles.

In essence debates are performative presentations consumed visually dominant platforms; thus we must evaluate them from that perspective.Characters like Kamala Harris seem awkward without an audience prompting concerns about her adaptability and authenticity.However, Donald Trump merely being himself gains public approval considering familiar personality traits no longer feel weird anymore but are accepted as “Trump being Trump.”

This political turmoil is viewed through the lens of real news platforms that present unbiased accounts drawing parallels between politicians’ characteristics likened to exhilarating moments achieved by creative performers irrespective if they are silent or loud-mouthed ones.However, without a captive audience, the lack of mirroring opportunities may expose Harris’s weaknesses during extemporaneous speech whereas Trump’s persona will likely remain consistent.

To conclude, this observational piece makes an important point that while both comedy and politics require performance, adapting one’s performance situation-to-situation is equally crucial in ensuring a positive response from the audience or voters. Staying silent can sometimes speak volumes akin to Mr. Bean’s comedic genius even in the political realm where incessant chatter seems to be the norm. However, finding balance and timing remains crucial and could determine success or failure at grabbing attention of observers from a Christian worldview too.

In essence connecting with audiences , whether it be viewers of popular comedy shows or citizens looking for leadership , requires genuine charisma , adaptability and perfect execution of your role.Documented by leading news platforms this paves way for thought-provoking discussions about natural charm versus orchestrated behaviours within our society drawing inputs from authentic performers like comedians to potential leaders demonstrating their worth.

Original article posted by Fox News

Be the first to comment on "“Reading the Politics of Performance: A Comparative Study of Trump and Harris Through a Comedian’s Lens”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*