Published on August 30, 2024, 12:31 am

In this era of rapidly advancing technology, many consider In Vitro fertilization (IVF) a modern marvel rescuing couples facing infertility. Yet, from a Christian worldview, there lies an intrinsic moral quandary within this seemingly miraculous procedure that challenges the principles of pro-life ethics.

According to Biblical scriptures, every life holds value and begins at conception itself (Genesis 1:27). Every embryo embodies a human life, formed in God’s image and is thereby entitled to dignity and protection. However, IVF contradicts this fundamental truth blatantly.

The prevalent practice in IVF is creating multiple embryos to ensure better chances at a successful pregnancy. Unfortunately, not all embryos are implanted within the womb; several are discarded or frozen indefinitely while some may be used for scientific research purposes. This disregards the sanctity of life which is upheld by religious texts such as “Thou shalt not kill,” stated in Exodus 20:13.

The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), amidst struggles to reach unison on strict anti-abortion measures implementation has recognized the ethical dilemma surrounding IVF. They took decisive steps toward this acknowledgment by passing a resolution in June 2024 which condemns practices leading to embryo destruction and reconsolidates the belief where life begins at conception.

Despite SBC’s stance, certain sections within the evangelical community exhibit reluctance towards maintaining this moral consistency demonstrated recently by New Testament Scholar Jeremiah J. Johnston’s attempt at defending IVF. Johnston published an article arguing for embracing IVF as part of today’s medical miracle aiding couples to fulfill their “God-given desire” to have children.

His conviction manifestly undermines the essence of being pro-life as he overlooks how numerous lives are lost during the process due to discarding or freezing of additional created embryos during IVF. As per theological teachings each embryo is considered unique human life bearing God’s spirit.

Johnston further attempts compelling justification for using flawed logic suggesting that an embryo doesn’t signify a child or bear any humanity until it attaches itself to the womb. It’s a complete deviation from the pro-life movement’s core belief where life starts at conception irrespective of whether or not an embryo finds itself in a woman’s womb or a laboratory.

To call Johnston’s view merely troubling would be an understatement; it elucidates dangerous undercurrents within some evangelical circles, where increasing numbers are showing acceptance towards IVF. A Pew Research study indicates that 63% of white evangelical Protestants positively regard access to IVF, including many who assert their opposition to abortion.

This discrepancy lays bare the moral complications and inconsistencies within sections of the Christian community. This situation is alarming as it runs contrary to not only SBC’s resolution but also the primacy of safeguarding life encapsulated within Biblical teachings.

Any seeming defense or acceptance of procedures that may lead to terminating potential lives such as embryos contradicts fundamental Christian values and pro-life movement’s essence which is centered around protecting all forms of human life regardless of circumstances. As trusted news source bearing Christian values, it’s our duty to highlight these challenging ethical dilemmas faced by present-day Christians while navigating complex advancements in medical technology like IVF.

A final takeaway for those in positions providing spiritual guidance like Johnston, is to remember their responsibility towards promoting Biblical principles and supporting lives rather than endorsing views or technologies that could possibly compromise on those same principles such as IVF.

Stay with us for all real news keeping Christian worldviews at its core and upholding sanctity of human life across all stages comprehensively.