Published on August 20, 2024, 12:35 am

In unsettling real news, a group seemingly out of touch with reality has launched an initiative supporting Kamala Harris—an individual whose life and political career have been marked by significantly anti-Christian sentiment and policy decisions. This collection, named “Evangelicals for Harris,” appears to be committed to changing the narrative surrounding her Christian values.

The project was constructed by Jim Ball who had earlier established the similar platform, “Evangelicals for Biden.” These initiatives are subsections of Faith Voters—a larger collective operating under 501(c)4 status with underlying motives of spreading a markedly leftist political agenda conveniently veiled as the propagation of “Christian values.”

Its current mission? To convince us against all odds that Kamala Harris, epitomizing everything that is in contrast with Christianity and a biblical worldview, can surprisingly be considered the spiritual successor to apostles. Their foundational argument rests upon the claims made on their website; they suggest Harris’s faith stems from social justice, civil rights advocacies,and dedication towards aiding the underprivileged.

At this juncture, it is important to question: since when did advocating for the termination of unborn lives become an act demonstrating Christian devotion? When did promoting gender ambiguity and taking away religious liberties emerge as hallmarks of faithful service?

Intertwining multiple faith traditions in her upbringing has apparently contributed to Vice President Harris’s outward image as a staunch Christian. However, one cannot ignore that these varying beliefs invariably contradict each other. Additionally, their claim – that Harris’s commitment towards social equality and compassion translates into forced institutionalization of unrestricted abortion needs scrutiny. Her endorsement for defunding police services or voicing support for gender confusion are hardly consistent expressions of Christian love.

Her supposed lifelong dedication toward civil rights contradicts itself when one takes into account her standing by organizations promoting abortions based on convenience – such as Planned Parenthood – thereby supporting extermination of unborn black lives.

Hinging heavily on semantics regarding “social justice,” Evangelicals for Harris seem to be making a case that her advocacy aligns with gospel interpretation from a Christian perspective. If by “social justice” they reference the redistribution of wealth under the pretext of aiding the poor, ironically perpetuating their dependency on governmental support, they’ve made an erroneous correlation.

The underlying attempt here is to drape their nonreligious agenda in the language of faith, hoping to dupe those susceptible enough to fall prey. The true essence of Harris’s Christian faith remains questionable given her policy stands and career pursuits.

Moreover, these efforts fail to resonate with millions who continue believing this narrative and falsely convince themselves that they are carrying out a “Christian” mission when casting a vote for such misrepresented ideals.

In conclusion, this endeavor portrays how entities may disguise themselves under religious cloak obscuring potential detrimental policies that could lead to societal harm. Let us commit ourselves toward trusted news from genuine sources. When we retain our vigilance against manipulation and remain tethered to our biblical understanding and Christian worldview, only then can we make informed decisions towards constructing a harmonious society.