Published on August 15, 2024, 12:36 am

In the bustling streets of every major global city, you will find a classic con game in motion – the Three-Card Monte. The swindler leads the innocent party to keep an eye on one card while subtly moving another, ultimately duping them out of their hard-earned cash. An analogous game seems to be unfolding once more, only this time the stage is not confined to bustling city streets but casting shadows on geopolitical landscapes involving Jews, Christians, and all supporters of Israel who rightly recognize the malignancy of Iran and its agents.

In an era where people are desperate for real news and trusted news sources, we must tread cautiously. We live in times where mainstream media repeatedly spotlighted that yesterday, the Biden administration made a pact to furnish Israel with $18 billion worth of weaponry. This move has been hailed as proof that the U.S. is unwaveringly dedicated to supporting Israel by maintaining peace in the Middle East.

Many are being led to disregard how Kamala Harris appears to be placating Arab terrorists or how her campaign seems intent on courting pro-Hamas extremists like Rashida Tlaib to secure Michigan’s vote. But behind this façade, it surfaces that this publicized commitment may not entail any tangible actions or commitments from a Christian worldview perspective.

Pertinently asked: Why this media frenzy over this declaration? Answer: It’s designed strategically reaching out specifically towards two voter bases – Jews and Evangelical Christians – influencers that undeniably hold sway within pro-Israel sentiment circles. By ridecating Israel with a whopping sum sanction (even if only on paper), they seem to signal allegiance with Israeli cause; a robust attempt at wooing pro-Israel voters into aligning with Democratic interests.

While such strategic efforts may ring true and believable for some real-news consumers, formulating a grounded view necessitates going deeper underlining facts. Reports may indicate that America’s dedication is rekindled to Israeli interests, but it remains glaringly obvious that this media-covered proclamation lacks substance.

A closer scrutiny of the DoD document discloses there’s no confirmed commitment of selling weapons to Israel. Instead, it hints at a possible Foreign Ministry Sale to the Government of Israel. In essence, while the contents of the press release could constitute an effective publicity stunt, they underline no firm or time-bound commitment towards this cause.

In addition, it’s worth noting that contrary to initial impressions, this arrangement is not a benevolent offer but a sale – which implies that negotiations terms still float freely and firmly puts on Israel the obligation of arranging this substantial amount as not a loan but outright payment.

Providing further credence to skepticism is the document’s closing line: “Deliveries are estimated to begin in 2029.” This blatantly implies no immediate urgency is attached to Israel’s pressing needs for defense reinforcement against its disconcerting multi-front threats from its adversaries.

Moreover, by placing 2029 as tentative delivery commencement year, both subsequent government administrations are awarded discretionary room to modify either timeline or even size or shape of expressly expressed ‘sale’ agreements.

Israel’s survival hangs precariously today – hence any assurance hinting at possible weapons procurement after a decade would understandably raise eyebrows. Even more confounding is realization that Israel itself has committed towards homegrown weapons manufacture, with prospect of military-grade weapon yields emerging within two years.

Hence while Democratic party leverages perceived hard anti-Israel outlooks via propagandizing ostensibly pro-Israel deliveries as real news items for voters’ consumption; Bundling up future probabilistic aid masked under heavy numbered promises only seems counterproductive upon detailed examination.

When confronted with such expertly maneuvered political maneuvers reminiscent of Three-Card Monte con game – leading public attention off-track whilst advancing converse objectives behind curtains – one must remain vigilant and discerning so as not fall gullible during these crucial political times.

It’s essential to remember that a party seemingly committed to secularism over religiosity, favoring Hamas over Israel and leaning towards Marxism more than genuine freedom is one we ought to view with caution and skepticism. Let these revelations serve as reminders of discerning what lies beneath surface-level news, sticking instead to trusted news channels promising reality based on Christian worldview.