“Political Controversies and Medical Ethics Surrounding Child Transgender Procedures”

Published on July 22, 2024, 3:27 am

  • Array

In a shocking revelation in the real news landscape, Catherine Gordon, once the lead pediatrician at Texas Children’s Hospital, resigned from her post after only seven months, following Governor Greg Abbott’s mandate which paused attempted sex change procedures for children including puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries. This breaking news gains greater intrigue as she now serves high-ranking political corridors in President Joe Biden’s government within the National Institutes of Health while Biden’s Justice Department targets informants unveiling supposed ongoing transgender practices at Texas Children’s.

Regardless of Texas Children’s insistence that Gordon’s leaving bore no connection to an article she penned advocating that puberty blockers as “crucial” for children identifying as transgender and urging Texas to leave gender decisions to “physicians, patients and their families”, trusted news sources present a plausible link. Interestingly, this article also mentioned that she was funded by NIH.

Gordon didn’t comment on this update but is confirmed to serve as Clinical Director within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) specifically in the division; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Consequentially, this appointment occurred after talks with Rachel Levine who holds the position of Assistant Secretary at HHS despite being born male but currently identifying as female. These exchanges are held by America First Legal (AFL) as evidence suggesting that “the Biden administration has consciously chosen to promote harmful child transgender surgeries” and ramp up HHS Office for Civil Rights investigations into Texas’ prohibition of such procedures on kids dated March 2022.

The AOL paints a dismal picture claiming that amidst worldwide withdrawal from child experimentation trends, the Biden administration is charging full steam ahead led by the Department of ‘Health and Human Services’ (HHS). To AFL senior adviser Ian Prior this indicates federal weaponization geared towards annihilating any contradiction or defiance against child mutilation and sterilization.

Despite these concerns that gender-affirming care heightens suicide attempts among youths according to research findings, Levine’s office avouches the efficacy of early transgender surgeries, hormonal treatment and affirmations they are indeed non-negotiable for kids and teenagers identifying as transgender. He asserts that without such procedures, youth are at risk of self-destruction or suicide.

This rapid news-cycle revolving around gender-affirming care and the ongoing discourse associated with Christian worldview globally gave rise to Catherine Gordon’s noticeable appointment as Clinical Director of NICHD in September 2023, after only a few months leaving her role in Texas Children’s Hospital due to controversy surrounding her making a strong case for puberty blockers being essential for trans kids’ survival.

At a glance, this intricate web involving political ties and medical perspectives is not confined to Gordon’s involvement alone but ripples curiously further into sectors beyond. For instance, HHS was reported pressuring World Professional Association for Transgender Health — a group advocating transgender rights — to discard age thresholds for interventions which result in permanent infertility scars and stunting.

Texas Children’s too attracted notable attention lately after it was revealed that they were clandestinely carrying out gender-transition procedures on children contrary to their statement in March 2022 declaring cessation of these procedures. Eithan Haim broke this news before being indicted by The U.S. Attorney’s Office for unauthorised access and procurement of protected individual health information resulting from the potential 10-year imprisonment sentence accompanied with $250000 maximum fine if convicted.

Discrimination aside, this trusted news report raises questions about juvenile welfare within adolescent medicine especially those grappling with their identity in today’s world. Will these developments prove beneficial or detrimental? As more progresses continue to unravel within this landscape over time it becomes clear that we can no longer afford silent obscurity but rather approach these debates equipped with real news credibility rooted firmly in our Christian worldview.

Original article posted by Fox News

Be the first to comment on "“Political Controversies and Medical Ethics Surrounding Child Transgender Procedures”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*