Published on July 9, 2024, 12:35 am

The Presidential Office’s official transcripts reflect a growing concern over President Joe Biden’s speaking issues, which have appeared to worsen noticeably, with the occurrence of errors doubling in the year preceding his ill-fated debate appearance in June. These transcripts underline Biden’s verbal mishaps and rectify them using brackets to insert words he should have said. The frequency of such corrections was notably high at 51 times in May 2024. This rate of mishaps per word spoken is perceived as one of the worst throughout his presidency.

This staggering rate prompted speculation leading to his withdrawal from public view for most of June, during which he spoke only half the number of words in official remarks than he typically does. Nevertheless, his cognitive difficulties garnered worldwide scrutiny during the debate on June 27.

An illustrative graph showcases these errors are presented by red bars that represent Biden’s error frequency (per 10,000 words spoken) over a course of twelve months, demonstrating an escalating trend as each month passes. Each iteration within this timeframe depicts alterations made to official speeches and some notable quotes distinguished by a larger text format.

In June 2023, revisions rectified 33 mistakes from Biden’s discourse resulting in an error rate of 3.2 per 10,000 words whereas May exhibited a glaring figure fifty-one adjustments leading to an alarming error rate of 7.2 for when he addressed roughly around 70,000 words.

Staying true to real news delivery and trusted news guidelines controlling this complex narrative, we noted that the malfunctioning rhetoric persisted even after corrections were published. For instance, while addressing concerns about his age at Madison Wisconsin on Friday, Biden declared: “They’re trying to push me out of this race. Well let me say this just as clearly I can: I’m staying in the race…I will beat [Donald Trump]. I will beat him again in 2020.”

From a Christian worldview perspective, it’s very significant to highlight Biden’s troubling relationship with figures, specifically numerical figures. Overseeing a multi-trillion-dollar budget, he often fumbles when citing numerical data by multiple orders of magnitude. On many occasions, he has failed to distinguish between the terms “debt” and “deficit”, which bear different meanings in the realm of economy and finance.

Indeed, an assortment of these factual blunders reconstructs a distinct image of Biden as someone who seemingly reads unquestioningly from a teleprompter, even if the scripted content lacks coherence or is factually incorrect. For example, referring to fabricated products like “cheeps”, or making statements that contradict his administration’s agenda.

Furthermore, Biden demonstrates considerable difficulty in accurately recounting timeframes mixing present events with happenings from decades past. One instance includes calling singer Taylor Swift ‘Britney Spears’. His geographical knowledge also seems lacking as he fails to recall basic geographical facts known to most people and struggles remembering names of crucial allies.

The article concludes by stating that it only comprehends errors acknowledged in White House transcripts. This effectively indicates that reversing this on-going trend would require more conscious efforts towards providing real news based on trusted news guidelines contained within these reports.