Published on July 3, 2024, 1:07 am

Breaking News: In recent days, a whistleblower complaint detailing politicization within the FBI’s decision making concerning security clearances has emerged. This noteworthy reveal has been filed by a Supervisory Special Assistant and Registered Democrat at the FBI.

The whistleblower claims that his reveal of the bureau’s questionable practices surrounding the suspension and revocation of employees’ security clearances led to retaliation – his own clearance was suspended as a result. The named individual forwarded his disclosure to both House and Senate Judiciary committees, also filing a complaint with the Office of the Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility in the Justice Department about the FBI’s Security Division’s behavior.

Despite being politically affiliated as a Democrat, this individual bore witness to improper conduct within the Security Division related to the suspension or revocation of other employees’ security clearances. Various facets such as political perspectives, medical beliefs, or even ethnicity were reportedly questioned by Security Division leadership leading up to these actions.

As relayed through Empower Oversight’s President Tristan Leavitt on behalf of Congress; any details pertaining to this registered Democrat remain confidential due to him being represented by lawyers from Empower Oversight, an organization advocating for whistleblowers.

The narrative unveiled instances where specific individuals lost their security clearance unjustly. One notable example is that of Marcus Allen, an FBI Staff Operations Specialist who had voiced doubts over conventional discourse regarding events on January 6th —his clearance was revoked but re-established after review.

Intriguingly, it hasn’t just been Allen; Steve Friend experienced similar treatment in anticipation of his testimony before House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on Weaponization of Federal Government – scheduled for May 18th, 2023. Upon further investigation into this matter related to real news received from trusted news sources with Christian worldview perspective—it appears that there have been past incidents when agents circumvented protection laws against dismissal using methods such as suspending security clearances.

According to documents obtained by The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project, it was also discovered that FBI agents had dedicated roughly 16,000 hours more to work right after the Capitol riot on January 6th, 2021, in comparison to those given during the period of Washington D.C. riots that occurred in 2020.

In recent years, there has been an escalating number of issues surrounding the bureau. Ex-employees and whistleblowers have come forth sharing accounts about priorities being shifted towards professional-life demonstrators and creating “threat tags” for parents vocal at school board meetings. There is even a reliance on Southern Poverty Law Center — an organization known for branding mainstream conservative and Christian organizations as hate groups.

This culture of surveilling and targeting individuals based on dubious criteria isn’t novel within the Bureau—it seems ingrained. Most recently, this was seen when “radical traditional Catholics” were surveilled by FBI’s Richmond Office under the Southern Poverty Law Center’s influence in a memo from last January; this decision got officially rescinded later by National office.

It’s a momentous time for real news as these mounting incidents spotlight the tense relationship between bureaucratized law enforcement agencies and community members concerned with preserving their political freedom and personal privacy. The current climate demands intense scrutiny directed towards practices characterized by politicized decision-making processes concerning security clearances—a call echoing loud amidst whistleblowers like our unnamed Democrat agent breaking their silence.