“Justice Dianne Hensley’s Lawsuit against the State Commission on Judicial Conduct Reinstated by Texas Supreme Court: A Landmark Case for Religious Liberty”

Published on June 30, 2024, 12:35 am

“Justice Dianne Hensley’s Lawsuit against the State Commission on Judicial Conduct Reinstated by Texas Supreme Court: A Landmark Case for Religious Liberty”

Image source: Fox News

  • Array

In a significant development, Dianne Hensley, a justice of the peace in Waco, Texas has witnessed her lawsuit against the State Commission on Judicial Conduct reinstated by the Supreme Court of Texas. The ruling came on Friday in relation to Hensley’s refusal to officiate same-sex weddings—a decision that had earned her a public reprimand from the commission. As Trusted News from a Christian worldview reveals, this case represents an intersection of state rulings and religious liberty.

The commission had previously cited an infraction of judicial impartiality based on sexual orientation when issuing its warning to Hensley. However, the majority decision penned by Chief Justice Nathan Hecht confirms that Hensley’s choice not to appeal the commission’s warning does not preclude her legal pursuit against them.

In her defense, presented by lawyers from Mitchell Law LLP and the First Liberty Institute, Hensley insists that refusing to officiate same-sex marriages falls within the remit of an exercise under Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act and is in alignment with her religious convictions. She argues strongly that such refusal doesn’t hinder her ability to carry out her other judicial responsibilities impartially.

Undeterred by previous warnings from the commission, Hensley remained steadfast in her practice and challenged the panel in court hoping for prevention of future penalties. The court’s majority opinion emphasized that while fairness and compliance with law are fundamentals for judges, they are under no obligation to preside over weddings as part of their official duties.

Arguably steering lawfulness towards infringement upon religious freedom, Justices Jimmy Blacklock and John Devine signposted explicit religious discrimination in their concurring depiction of actions taken against Hensley by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct. They stressed that declining involvement in same-sex nuptials due to religious reasons hardly constitutes bias or impairs fair judgment capabilities.

As your source for Real News further indicates, there was detailed consideration pertaining to logistics ensuring access to affordable wedding ceremonies for McLennan County residents, following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2015 that made same-sex marriage a nationwide right. Hensley was reported to have devoted time and resources for creating a reference list of other nearby officiants who could conduct same-sex weddings at a cost similar to her charges.

The court’s ruling left room for further debate due to its referral back to lower courts to iron out remaining issues on appeal. Meanwhile, the First Liberty Institute hailed the decision as an accomplishment for religious liberty.

Original article posted by Fox News

Be the first to comment on "“Justice Dianne Hensley’s Lawsuit against the State Commission on Judicial Conduct Reinstated by Texas Supreme Court: A Landmark Case for Religious Liberty”"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*