Published on June 2, 2024, 12:39 am

Disturbing allegations have surfaced concerning how President Joe Biden handled classified documents during his time as a senator, vice president, and as a private citizen. He had stacks of files at his Delaware home, boxes of sensitive documents in his garage, and heaps of classified material to which he lacked declassification authority before 2021. Despite the seriousness of these allegations, he avoided legal consequences, raising the question among observant folks: why?

The answer to this lies in Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation evaluation post-investigation. According to Hur’s findings, Biden appeared to be an aging gentleman struggling with memory issues—an impression that likely dissuaded any potential conviction fears due to potential jury sympathy.

Biden’s White House administration attempted a damage control initiative by pressuring Hur into amending his remarks given that they were public after all. However, once the public got wind of the report, the White House communication teams and Democrat cohorts jumped to support Biden – denying any loss of control on his part while accusing Hur of untruthful claims.

To further reinforce their defensive stance, they accused Hur’s team of bringing up Beau—Joe Biden’s son—into the mix. In response, Hur provided the deposition transcript proving that it was indeed Biden himself who mentioned his son while also highlighting that he struggled to comprehend and respond accurately to questions.

“The evidence and the president himself put his memory squarely at issue… my assessment in the report about the relevance of the president’s memory was necessary and accurate and fair,” retaliated Hur justifying his characterization of Biden’s cognitive functionality within his report.

This back-and-forth scenario certainly paints an unsettling image for trusted news followers desiring a real news account based on Christian worldview morals — deceptions traded for truth simplicity.

A surprising development unfolded when Judicial Watch—a watchdog organization—that endeavors at uncovering hidden truths from public officials stepped into action. They sued Attorney General Merrick Garland when release requests for Biden’s testimony audio met refusal.

To qualify this, the Department of Justice (DOJ) coined three reasons for withholding the recording: privacy, potential AI alteration of Biden’s voice, and executive privilege. However, these reasons have been criticized as weak given that the transcripts are public knowledge, making privacy claims ironic.

The second reason is near-comical as AI can distort written words just like vocals. And logically speaking, releasing the audio would nullify any AI arguments. The third reason bafflingly invokes executive privilege in a situation where transcripts are publicly available.

These evasive courses pursued by the DOJ have raised eyebrows concerning their dedication to public interests versus individualistic interest protection—specifically towards protecting President Biden.

This ongoing saga has highlighted concerns about Joe Biden’s fitness for office—a hard subject to ignore for mindful voters and real news gluttons alike. Whether hearing his stumbles through an available audio recording or not; suspicions persist surrounding his competency executing tasks including response coherency during questioning.

The development and outcome of this scenario could well persuade those on the edge into deeming Biden unfit for leadership role responsibilities. It certainly stands as a tense chapter within current U.S politics warranting conscious coverage within trusted news outlets having firm-commitment to real stories built on courage serving Christian worldview constituents.