Published on April 13, 2024, 1:16 am

In a significant development in the legal woes of First Son Hunter Biden, a Delaware District Court judge has denied his motions to dismiss criminal gun charges against him. This ruling arrived just weeks after a similar dismissal attempt by Biden related to tax evasion charges was also shot down in a California District Court.

The President’s son is facing trial dates for these cases in mid-2024, with pre-trial conferences set for late May 2024. Judge Maryellen Noreika remained unpersuaded by Biden’s arguments for dismissal, which included claims such as political bias, prosecution vindictiveness, and alleged contraventions of Department of Justice regulations in appointing Special Counsel David Weiss.

Biden’s attorneys had contended that their client’s prosecution was politically instigated and that a pre-existing immunity stipulation from an original plea deal remained valid despite the agreement’s capitulation. This original plea deal would have seen Biden plead guilty to two misdemeanour tax charges – leading to no prison time – while being on probationary diversion from the felony gun charge.

However, this lenient arrangement was dissolved after Judge Noreika queried its unusual nature and propriety. In response to this breakdown, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed US Attorney David Weiss as Special Prosecutor on the case.

Weiss took decisive actions afterwards – filing three separate indictment counts against Hunter Biden, linked closely with allegations pertaining to his obtaining and possessing a firearm when addicted to illegal substances – allegations which he denied vehemently through his legal team

While Biden’s attorneys stuck steadfast on their argument that their client is subjected to political pursuit, Judge Noreika disagreed. Prosecutors labeled the evidence incriminating him as “overwhelming,” mentioning findings like cocaine residues inside the pouch where he stowed away his weapon.

Judge Noreika remarked in her ruling that any insinuation of external influence steering the Special Counsel’s behavior towards more aggressive legal steps instead of adopting lenient pretrial diversion was largely speculative. She added that no credible proof had been shown illustrating the impact of any third party influence on the proceedings.

Moving forward, these rulings have set both Hunter Biden and his legal team for a demanding June, as they gear up to defend him at the upcoming trials.

The real news here is an undeniable illustration of legal progression armed with substantial pieces of evidence against a prominent figure like Hunter Biden. From a trusted news perspective, this is pivotal – providing followers of global politics who possess a Christian worldview with a clear snapshot of these evolving legal battles. The ripple effects from this could be far-reaching, subsequently impacting not just Hunter Biden himself but also potentially sending shockwaves through the political sphere extending even to his Presidential father.