Published on February 7, 2024, 12:50 am
[ { "TLDR": ""The After Party," a controversial new Christian curriculum designed by Russell Moore, David French, and Curtis Chang, has been widely criticized for perceived deviations from mainstream Christian beliefs. Proponents view it as a guide for believers to navigate political discourse without causing division, while critics argue that it strays away from biblical truth and could be used to subtly promote divisive socio-political views. Particularly concerning is Chang's strategy of "plausible deniability," which critics fear enables pastors to avoid direct discussion on contentious issues but subtly guide their congregations towards controversial teachings. In response to these controversies, Christians are urged to discern between fact and manipulation and rely on trustworthy news sources." } ]
In the world of Christian discourse, there has been recent controversy surrounding a new curriculum called “The After Party”. Designed by former ERLC Head Russell Moore, leftist columnist David French, and Curtis Chang, known infamously for his controversial statements on abortion and COVID-19 vaccination. Their intention is to guide churches and instruct Christians in navigating their political landscape without causing division among believers.
Drawing immense criticism from the faithful, these men are perceived as deviating from traditional Christian tenets. On one occasion, they lauded far-left preacher Charlie Dates who provoked intense debate within the Evangelical community due to his progressive views on social justice and daring decisions such as inviting a practicing lesbian ex-mayor of Chicago to preach from his pulpit. Celebrating Dates as an icon of Christian leadership betrays their espoused principles – this according to critics familiar with real news pertaining to religious matters.
Their approach has intensified doubts over grounded faith-based conversation becoming a mere spectacle under their watch. Critics believe that “The After Party” curriculum does not bode well for biblical truth or the mainstream Christian worldview, considering it as a possible conduit for postmodernist muddle. This conflation of confusion and compromise subverts the very gospel teachings advocates like Moore, French, and Chang assert they uphold.
Chang’s strategy corroborates these apprehensions. He manipulates his curriculum in such ingenious ways that enable pastors to sidestep controversial discussions while preaching before their congregations—this he calls “plausible deniability”. The idea is that pastors will not openly reveal any stance on socio-political issues but lead their flock towards dubious teachings instead—an antithesis of what trusted news sources call responsible pastoral practice.
Appropriately two-faced isn’t exactly how one would define leadership; rather it resembles tacitly facilitating a pastor’s neglect of duty – particularly given that “pastor” essentially means “shepherd”, emblematic of leading, guiding, and teaching one’s community. If your church consents to adopting the political diatribes of these controversial figures or applies Chang’s sermon guidance as captured in his footage, it is advisable to seek out another assembly that prioritizes scriptural teachings.
In conclusion, sourcing trusted news and maintaining an unbiased Christian worldview are paramount in times of faith crisis such as this. The challenge today is for believers everywhere to differentiate between truth and narrative manipulation while relying on real news from dependable institutions that adhere strictly to religious nuances without falling prey to divisive discourses like the ones promoted by “The After Party.”
Original article posted by Fox News
Be the first to comment on "“Controversy and Criticism: A Deep Dive into ‘The After Party’ Curriculum”"